|
Photos by Peter Bosy
Click for a
larger veiw
Cast
(in order of appearance)
Newsman
One (Cooper),
Dave Santchi
Senator Orrin Knox, Illinois,
Bill Hammack
Newsperson
Three (Reigel),
Tori
House**
Newsman Two (Marty),
Tom Schutt
Senator
Brigham M. Anderson, Utah, Rob
Nardini
Mabel Anderson, Brig’s wife,
Laura Leonardo-Ownby
Senator Seabright B. Cooley, South Carolina,
Cal Turner
Senatorial
Aide
Spencer Dees
**
Harley
Hudson, V. P. of the United States,
Larry Horn
Senator
Robert Durham Munson, Michigan,
Majority Leader of the Senate
Dick
Jacoby
Senator
Toni August , Minnesota,
Chairman Foreign Relations Committee
Sue Kuehnhold *
William
A. Hunting ton, Nominee for Secretary of
State
Mike DeKovic
Presidential
Aide
Mark
Barefield**
Claire
Munson, Bob’s wife
Lori
B. Proska
Senator
Fran Van Ackerman, Wyoming, Kathleen Kusper
Members
of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee
Senator
Carroll Richardson, Arkansas, Alfred
Dreifke
Senator John DeWilton, Vermont,
Michael Williams
Senator
Jane Winthrop, Massachusetts,
Carol Clarke
Herbert
Gelman
Jim Kopp*
The
President of the United States
Dennis
Hudson
Liz
Hotchkis, Senator Anderson’s Secretary,
Sue Wisthuff*
Rally
Speaker
Karen
Arnold
Senator
Wilson Calloway, California, Rick
Pavia
Senator Stanley Danta, Connecticut,
Robert
Erck*
*new
to our stage
**
denotes CTWS student
Dramaturg's
Diary
By
Dave Bremer
Article
II, Section 2, Paragraph 2, of the United
States Constitution
[The President] shall have power, by and with the Advice and Consent of
the Senate, to make treaties, provided two
thirds of the Senators present concur; and
he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice
and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors,
other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges
of the Supreme Court, and all other Officers
of the United States, whose Appointments are
not herein otherwise provided for, and which
shall be established by law: but the Congress
may by law vest the Appointment of such inferior
officers as they think proper, in the President
alone, in the courts of law, or in the heads
of departments.
Since
its foundation, the Senate has closely guarded
its power to review and either approve or
reject presidential appointees to Executive
or Judicial branch posts. Here are some
items from the Senate’s history of using
this power and prerogative.
In
its history, the Senate has confirmed 114
Supreme Court nominations and over 500 Cabinet
nominations. Approximately 4,000 civilian
and 65,000 military nominations are submitted
to the Senate during each two-year session
of Congress; only a very small portion (but
sometimes a highly visible one) fails to
receive action.
Historically,
Supreme Court nominations have attracted
the most scrutiny by the Senate, the media,
and scholars. Since 1789, the Senate has
rejected fewer then 2% of all Cabinet nominees.
In that same time, nearly 25% of all Supreme
Court nominees have been rejected, failed
to be confirmed, or been withdrawn from
nomination.
For
most of its history, the Senate at large
dealt with most nominations. Since the
mid-20th Century, it has become
routine to refer nominations to Senate Committee.
The
greatest number of Senate rejections occurred
in the post-Civil War period. It was time
of intense political views concerning reconstruction
and sharply divided along political party
lines.
During
President Grant’s administration, the Senate
rejected 9 out of 58 contested Executive
and Judicial nominations. In President
Hayes’ administration, 51 out of 91 contested
nominees were rejected.
During
most of U.S. history, the President exercised
a custom established by George Washington
called “Senatorial Courtesy.” This custom
involves the President deferring to the
preferences of Senators belonging to the
home state of a prospective presidential
nominee.
Following
Rutherford B. Hayes’ administration, James
Garfield tried to accommodate all major
political factions in his dealings with
the Senate. However, he decided to challenge
“Senatorial Courtesy” in a dispute that
arose over appointments to federal posts
in New York. These involved appointments
to collector positions in the Customs House
of the Port of New York. This was one of
the most desirable positions for presidential
appointment at that time, and one of the
most lucrative in regard to political boodle
— if placed in the wrong hands. Opposing
his nominations were New York Senators Roscoe
Conkling and John Platt. Both were Republican
“stalwarts” and heavily involved in the
New York state political machine, anchored
in Tammany Hall. Conkling was also one
of the most powerful Senators in Washington
by grace of his committee chairmanships.
President
Garfield raised the level of debate by declaring
the real issue at stake was whether the
President was to be “the Registering Clerk
to the Senate,” or the Chief Executive of
the Nation. Garfield refused to withdraw
his nomination. Conkling and Platt vigorously
opposed him. When Garfield ultimately refused
to withdraw his nominations, Conkling and
Platt resigned from the Senate. The Senators
from New York planned to gain a moral victory
by winning reelection and thus trumping
the President. Without Conkling’s influence,
the Senate approved of the nominations.
Conkling and Platt ran for reelection—and
both lost. In 1883, James Garfield was
assassinated by a demented office seeker.
This hastened the passage of the 1883 Civil
Service Act. This law removed many jobs
from appointee status by taking them out
of patronage control. This reduced opportunities
for friction between Congress and the President.
In
the 20th Century, on only 3 occasions,
1925, 1959 and 1989, did the Senate reject
proposed Cabinet officers. Other major
nominees were specifically rejected less
then 30 times during the same time period.
In
1947, the Senate passed to control by Republicans.
The relations with President Truman were
so cordial that this Senate did not reject
any of his appointees. However, so convinced
were they of Truman’s defeat in 1948, that
the Senate failed to act on 11, 122 nominations
to positions in government, with the intent
that President Dewey would fill them when
he got elected.
Oddly
enough, with the Senate back in Democratic
power, and Truman reelected, Truman’s biggest
clash would come in a bitter nomination
battle within the Democratic Party over
the nominee for head of Federal Power Commission.
The Democratic Senate voted 15 to 53 and
rejected his nominee.
In
recent years, John Tower (R-Texas) had served
24 years in the Senate when he retired in
1985. During those years, he had alienated
his Senate colleagues with his abrasive
manner. In January of 1989 President George
H. Bush nominated Tower as Secretary of
Defense. During an investigation by the
Senate Armed Services Committee, his opponents
built a case against his character rather
than his competence. Confronted with evidence
of gross personal misconduct on the part
of Tower, the Senate engaged in a blistering
and bitter debate before killing his nomination
by a vote of 47 to 53, which ran mostly
along party lines. Tower became the first
nominee ever to be rejected for a position
on a new President’s Cabinet. He also is
the first former Senator to be turned down
by his former colleagues for a Cabinet post.
The irony was that the Senate Armed Services
Committee was a committee Tower chaired
less than five years before his rejection.
|
Production
Credits
| Director
|
Jack
Phillips |
| Technical
Director |
Troy
Lee Brasuell, Jr. |
| Stage
Manager |
George
Dempesy |
| Assistant
Stage Managers |
Darla
Goudeau, Kelli M. Kubicki |
| Costume
Co-Designers |
Mary
Dempsey, Pat Giesler |
| Costume
Crew |
Lori
D’Asta, Adele Davis, Terry Harrold,
Martha Niles, Carolyn Redding, Mary
Smith, Jane Stacy, Dorothy Tressler,
Charron Traut |
| Dramaturg |
Dave Bremer |
| Hospitality
Chair |
Carol
Clarke |
| Hospitality
Crew and Bakers |
Dorothy
Attermeyer, Rosemary Beale, Jan Benedict,
Vicki Blair, Carole Borg, Susan Cardamone,
Ruth Cekal, Mary Clarke, Julie Crnovich,
Angelee Favoino, Mark Favoino, Tom Frohnapfel,
Bonnie Hilton, Karen Holbert, Carol
Hudson, Karla Hudson, Ann Marie Hultgren,
Harry Hultgren, Mike Huth, Pat Huth,
Patti Jeka, Donna Kanak, Eleanor Kanak,
Rich Kanak, Kathy Kusper, Bill Love,
Joyce Love, Jeff Miklos, Arlene Page,
Katie Pecis, Leslie Price, Jan Quinn,
Pat Rafferty, Joan Roeder, Nancy Schifo,
Jane Stacey, Liz Steele, Carol Suda,
Catey Sullivan, Michael
Tinaglia, Gini Welch, Lynne Woulfe |
| Lighting Designer |
Mary Ellen Schutt |
| Lighting Crew Chair |
Art
Kelly |
| Lighting Crew |
Lee
Brasuell, Benton Bullwinkel, Paul Roach, Betsy Stiles |
| Makeup
Designers |
Jackie
Weiher, Marilyn Weiher |
| Makeup
Crew |
Peg
Callaghan, Pat Huth, Julie Knoch, Carmel
Opre, Mary Pavia |
Properties
Co-Designers |
Peggy
Carlson, Eileen Crow |
| Properties
Crew |
Dave
Briggs, Holly Cejka, Bill FitzGerald,
Karla Hudson, Mike Janke, Rich Kropp,
James Pusztay, Kevin Slattery, Margaret
Solick |
| Set
Construction Chair |
Mark
Hewitt |
| Set
Construction Crew |
Dave
Briggs, Holly Cejka, Bill FitzGerald,
Karla Hudson, Mike Janke, Rick Kropp,
James Pusztay, Kevin Slattery, Margaret
Solick |
| Set
Designer |
Troy
Lee Brasuell, Jr. |
| Set
Painting Chair |
Sandy Squillo |
| Set
Painting Crew |
John
Allen, Tricia Boren, Tim Feeney, Tom
Frohnapfel, Mary Pavia, Susan Remy,
Rob Snyder |
| Sound
Designers |
Stephanie Bullwinkel, Mike Prosise |
| Box
Office Chair |
Mary Ellen Schutt |
| Box
Office Crew |
Ed Barrow, Susan Cardamone, Danna Durkin, Tom Frohnapfel, Patricia
Jeka, Patti Roeder, Marilyn Wilson |
| House
Manager Chair |
Bill
Wilson |
| Front
Row Center flyer |
Joe
Petrolis |
| Group
Sales Chair |
Betsy
Stiles |
| Group
Sales Crew |
Carol
Clarke |
| Poster
Distribution |
Kathleen
Kusper |
| Production
Coordinator |
Linda
Roberts |
| Program
Advertising |
Peggy
Carlson |
| Publicity
Chair |
Bonnie Hilton |
| Program
Editors |
Bill
Hammack, Marion J. Reis |
| Program
Production |
Stephanie
Williams |
| Website |
Judy
DiVita |
Director's
Corner
By
Jack Phillips
In
the spring of 2005, The New York Times
ran an op-ed piece suggesting, “It’s time
to revive the play Advice And Consent.”
The piece made the play selection committee
at the Theatre of Western Springs very
happy because we had all ready chosen
Advise And Consent as part of our
2005-2006 Season. The reason the play
was chosen by the committee and suggested
by the Times is that it gives us
a behind-the-scenes look at what goes
on during a Senate confirmation of a presidential
nominee for a Cabinet position. Most of
us are fascinated by what happens when
a controversial nominee is brought forward.
We have been aware as outsiders of a number
of contentious nominations. There are
two major changes in this production from
the production based on the Pulitzer Prize
winning novel by Alan Drury.
We have updated the time from 1960 to
1976 in order to include women senators.
I wanted to point out that abuse of power
and excessive ambition are not gender
specific.
The other change is a change in politics.
The play concerns a choice that senators
have to make about a moral issue. In 1960,
senators often made that choice regardless
of political party affiliations. In the
story of the play, senators from both
sides make their decisions based on the
moral stand each wishes to take. Since
1994, political choices are made more
as adherence to a party philosophy. Choices
are made based on whether a decision furthers
the long-term party philosophy rather
than an individual belief.
We
make no judgment in this production. We
present the story as written.
Acknowledgements
Produced
with special permission from Dramatists
Play Service, Inc.
We are grateful to The Fruit Store,
Western Springs and Hinsdale, for providing
apple cider at cost with free delivery.

Thursday
Nights
are audience Talkback nights.
Join us immediately following
the show
for a discussion with the cast, crew, and
experts in the
subject.
Photos
Page 2
|